Saturday 23 January 2010

Paul’s apostleship

This continues my series on apostleship.

Paul’s apostleship is both similar and different to the twelve. On the one hand, he was adamant that although he had not been with Christ during his earthly ministry, his apostleship was as authoritative as the twelve. Paul had seen, and been commissioned by, the risen Christ (Rom. 1:1; 1 Cor. 1:1; 9:1; 15:8; Gal. 1:1, 11-24). Acts repeats Paul’s conversion three times, each time linking it with a divine commission to preach Christ (Acts 9:1-25; 22:3-21; 26:12-23). Paul’s own report of his divine commission is that God in Christ apostello him (Acts 22:21; 26:17; 1 Cor 1:17). Luke, Peter and Paul himself are at pains to demonstrate that Paul and the other apostles share a common, authoritative testimony to Christ (Acts 9:26-27; 1 Cor. 15:8-11; Gal. 2:6-9; 2 Pet. 3:15-16). Paul insists that the Holy Spirit authorises his written words as being God’s commands (1 Cor 14:37). Therefore, we must accept Paul’s testimony to Christ as equally authoritative as the twelve.

On the other hand, he is aware that his apostleship is different from theirs, in at least two aspects. Chronologically, they were apostles before him (Gal. 1:17). Secondly, his background was that of an opponent and persecutor (Acts 7:58; 8:1; 9:1-2; 22:3-5; 26:9-11; 1 Tim. 1:12-16). The twelve had been disciples – wayward, misunderstanding and unreliable, but disciples nonetheless. Hence Paul’s sense of being ‘abnormally born’ (1 Cor. 15:8).

No comments: